Before Brown shows up: Democrats push ahead with Labor nominee despite GOP complaints

By Sam Hananel, AP
Monday, February 1, 2010

Over GOP protests, Democrats advance Labor nominee

WASHINGTON — Before losing their 60-vote majority, Senate Democrats on Monday advanced a controversial Labor Department appointment in danger of permanent limbo because of Republican complaints about her qualifications.

The 60-32 vote — divided strictly along party lines — allows lawmakers to begin debate on the confirmation of Patricia Smith to become solicitor of the agency. Her nomination had been held up for months by Sen. Mike Enzi of Wyoming, the top Republican on the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee.

To move ahead in spite of the hold placed on her nomination, Democrats needed 60 votes. All 58 Democrats and both independents voted to advance the nomination while 32 Republicans opposed it. A confirmation vote on Smith, which requires only a majority, is expected Tuesday.

Sen.-elect Scott Brown of Massachusetts will be the Republicans’ 41st vote, ending the Democrats’ ability to thwart a filibuster on most Senate action. Brown, who won a special election to replace the late Democratic Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, is expected to be sworn in Feb. 11.

Enzi spokesman Michael Mahaffey said the senator preferred that votes on controversial nominees wait until Brown had been seated. In response, Jim Manley, a spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said the idea of waiting was “ridiculous” and added, “That is what a senator is supposed to do — vote.”

Enzi and other Republicans claim Smith misled lawmakers during testimony last year about her role in creating a New York program that allows labor unions to help uncover wage-and-hour violations.

Smith has conceded that she “misspoke” in explaining how the program was created and about plans to expand it. But Democrats describe the misstatements as minor and say she was simply unaware that one of her deputies consulted with union officials about creating the $6,000 program.

“It was simply a mistake in her testimony because she didn’t know what her staff was doing,” Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the chairman of the health committee, said in a floor speech.

Enzi charged that Smith was trying to downplay GOP concerns about the program. “The inconsistencies in her testimony lead me to question her ability to interact with Congress in a candid manner and manage the enforcement of labor laws by the Office of Solicitor in an evenhanded and fair manner,” he said.

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :