Iran’s Ahmadinejad cites ‘not single credible proof’ Iran working on nuclear arms
By APMonday, May 3, 2010
Iran’s president says no proof of weapons plan
UNITED NATIONS — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is rejecting allegations his country is developing nuclear weapons, citing “not a single credible proof.”
Ahmadinejad is condemning the continued possession of nuclear weapons by the United States and others. He spoke Monday at the start of a monthlong conference reviewing the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty.
He says such atomic weapons are an encouragement to other countries to develop similar arsenals. He is calling for a timetable for elimination of nuclear arms worldwide.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP’s earlier story is below.
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad brought his nuclear showdown with Western powers to New York on Monday, turning a U.N. treaty conference into a stage for the long-running confrontation over Iran’s uranium enrichment program.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, opening the monthlong review of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), directly challenged Tehran.
“The onus is on Iran to clarify the doubts and concerns about its program,” the U.N. chief told the delegates from 189 nations.
He called on the Tehran government “to fully comply with Security Council resolutions” demanding that it halt enrichment, which Washington and others contend is meant to produce the nuclear fuel for bombs in violation of Iran’s NPT obligations.
Ahmadinejad, the only head of state participating in the session, was scheduled to speak later Monday morning.
Departing Tehran on Sunday, the Iranian leader made clear he would assail U.S.-led efforts to impose a new round of U.N. sanctions on his country. “Under the pretext of prevention of nuclear weapons proliferation, they impose heavy pressures on independent countries,” Ahmadinejad complained to reporters.
He is also expected to counter with a denunciation of the United States and other nuclear-armed nations for their slow movement toward disarmament. “The atomic bomb has become a tool for bullying, domination and expansionism,” he said Sunday.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, following Ahmadinejad to the U.N. stage later Monday, suggested over the weekend he was coming to New York “to divert attention and confuse the issue.”
“We’re not going to permit Iran to try to change the story from their failure to comply” with the NPT, she said on Sunday’s “Meet the Press” on NBC.
While delegates assess the state of the NPT in U.N. conference halls, American and European diplomats will be working elsewhere to reach agreement with the sometimes reluctant China and Russia on a fourth round of U.N. Security Council economic penalties to impose on Iran.
Although Ahmadinejad’s presence meant the first-day agenda was dominated by the Iran issue, it was only the beginning of a four-week diplomatic marathon meant to produce a consensus final document pointing toward ways to better achieve the NPT’s goals of checking the spread of nuclear weapons, while working toward reducing and eventually eliminating them.
The treaty is regarded as the world’s single most important pact on nuclear arms, credited with preventing their proliferation to dozens of nations since it entered into force in 1970. It was a grand global bargain: Nations without nuclear weapons committed not to acquire them; those with them committed to move toward their elimination; and all endorsed everyone’s right to develop peaceful nuclear energy.
The 189 treaty members gather every five years to discuss new approaches to problems, by agreeing, for example, that the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N. nuclear inspection agency, should be strengthened. The only countries that are not treaty members are India, Pakistan, North Korea, all of which have nuclear arsenals or weapons programs, and Israel, which has an unacknowledged nuclear arsenal.
But the NPT conference cannot easily “name and shame” an alleged treaty violator, such as Iran, since as a member state its delegation would block consensus.
At three of seven past conferences, delegates failed to produce a declaration, including in 2005, at a time when the U.S. administration, under President George W. Bush, was unenthusiastic about arms control talks.
President Barack Obama has steered the U.S. back onto a negotiating track, including with a new U.S.-Russian agreement to reduce their thousands of long-range nuclear arms. Despite that, Libran N. Cabactulan, the Philippine diplomat who is president of this 2010 NPT conference, said he finds the No. 1 goal of many treaty nations is to press the NPT nuclear powers — also including Britain, France and China — to move more rapidly toward disarmament.
In his opening remarks, the U.N.’s Ban listed “real gains for disarmament” as his first “benchmark for success.”
To that end, the Nonaligned Movement of 118 developing nations has submitted to the conference a detailed “plan of action” for moving toward global nuclear disarmament by 2030. One its earliest steps is full ratification and entry into force of the 1996 treaty banning all nuclear tests.
In the first concrete step associated with this 2010 meeting, Indonesia announced last week it would ratify the test-ban treaty. Obama has pledged to push for U.S. ratification of the pact, which was rejected by the Republican majority in the U.S. Senate in 1999.
Tags: Barack Obama, International Agreements, Iran, Middle East, North America, Nuclear Weapons, Tehran, United Nations, United States, Weapons Administration, Weapons Of Mass Destruction