Drugmaker Merck discloses Justice, SEC probes of possible foreign anti-bribery law violationsBy AP
Monday, August 9, 2010
Merck discloses probe of foreign sales practices
TRENTON, N.J. — Two federal agencies are probing drugmaker Merck & Co. for possibly violating anti-bribery laws in multiple foreign countries.
Merck, the world’s second-biggest drugmaker by revenue, has received inquiry letters from both the Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission, the company said in a regulatory filing.
The letters “seek information about activities in a number of countries and reference the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” according to Merck.
The act bars U.S. companies from bribing government or corporate officials in other countries to win business, among other things.
Merck, which is based in Whitehouse Station, N.J., disclosed the investigation in a regulatory filing submitted to the SEC on Friday.
“The company is cooperating with the agencies in their requests and believes that this inquiry is part of a broader review of pharmaceutical industry practices in foreign countries,” Merck said in a brief statement included in its quarterly financial filing with the SEC.
Merck and most other large pharmaceutical companies for the past couple years have been hotly pursuing sales in emerging markets including China, Russia, India and Brazil. Government health programs in such countries often control the prices allowed for prescription drugs and decide which brands they will buy for millions of hospital and other patients.
The industry sees high-volume sales in emerging markets as its best hope for growth. Companies have been adding thousands of salespeople and building factories staffed by low-paid workers in those countries.
Revenue growth is waning in the U.S. and Europe. Reasons include the global recession, bigger U.S. government discounts under the health care overhaul and dozens of blockbuster medicines getting cheap generic competition in Western countries — with few big new products coming on the market to replace those billions in annual sales.
Meanwhile, Merck has a history of trouble regarding promotion of its products.
It’s paid out $4.85 billion to settle roughly 50,000 lawsuits brought by patients or survivors of people who took its former blockbuster painkiller Vioxx and claimed Merck downplayed the pill’s dangers. Vioxx doubled the risk of heart attacks and strokes, including fatal ones.
Currently, Merck is operating under a Corporate Integrity Agreement with the government covering its promotional practices and price reporting.
The agreement runs through February 2013 and is similar to two earlier, five-year corporate integrity agreements with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.
Merck entered into one of the agreements in February 2008 and Schering-Plough Corp. entered into the other agreement in 2004 and later extended it for a couple years. Merck bought Schering-Plough for $41 billion last November.
The agreements in general all require Merck and its Schering-Plough unit to maintain an ethics training program, as well as “policies and procedures governing promotional practices” and reporting of prices for its drugs to the Medicaid health program.
Medicaid is entitled to the lowest discount Merck, or any drugmaker, gives to other customers, such as hospitals or prescription benefit managers.
Major drugmakers have repeatedly been investigated for allegedly overcharging Medicaid by reporting inflated drug prices to the government. That’s resulted in numerous multimillion-dollar settlements paid by the pharmaceutical companies.
In afternoon trading, Merck shares rose 37 cents at $35.35.
Tags: Corporate Ethics, Corporate Governance, Government Programs, Government Regulations, Government-funded Health Insurance, Health Care Costs, Health Care Industry, Health Issues, Industry Regulation, New Jersey, North America, Trenton, United States, Whitehouse Station