13 state attorneys general sue to stop health care overhaul, claim it’s unconstitutional
By Brendan Farrington, APTuesday, March 23, 2010
13 attorneys general sue over health care overhaul
TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — Attorneys general from 13 states sued the federal government Tuesday, claiming the landmark health care overhaul is unconstitutional just seven minutes after President Barack Obama signed it into law.
The lawsuit was filed in Pensacola after the Democratic president signed the 10-year, $938 billion bill the House passed Sunday night.
“The Constitution nowhere authorizes the United States to mandate, either directly or under threat of penalty, that all citizens and legal residents have qualifying health care coverage,” the lawsuit says.
Legal experts say it has little chance of success.
Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum is taking the lead and is joined by attorneys general from South Carolina, Nebraska, Texas, Michigan, Utah, Pennsylvania, Alabama, South Dakota, Idaho, Washington, Colorado and Louisiana. All are Republicans except James “Buddy” Caldwell of Louisiana, a Democrat.
Some states are considering separate lawsuits — Virginia filed its own Tuesday — and still others may join the multistate suit. In Michigan, the Thomas More Law Center of Ann Arbor, a Christian legal advocacy group, sued on behalf of itself and four people it says don’t have private health insurance and object to being told they have to purchase it.
McCollum, who is running for governor, argues the bill will cause “substantial harm and financial burden” to the states.
State Sen. Dan Gelber, a Democrat running for McCollum’s job, said the lawsuit is nothing more than a stunt to gain political points as McCollum runs for governor.
“It is rank politics and nothing but,” said Gelber, noting that 4 million Floridians don’t have health insurance. “He spends no time talking about what he would do as governor about that, but he seems to have an inordinate amount of time to jump up on a soap box and start demagoguing on the issue.”
The lawsuit claims the bill violates the 10th Amendment, which says the federal government has no authority beyond the powers granted to it under the Constitution, by forcing the states to carry out its provisions but not reimbursing them for the costs.
“No public policy goal — no matter how important or well-intentioned — can be allowed to trample the protections and rights guaranteed by our Constitution,” Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott said in a statement.
The lawsuit also says the states can’t afford the new law. Using Florida as an example, the lawsuit says the overhaul will add almost 1.3 million people to the state’s Medicaid rolls and cost the state an additional $150 million in 2014, growing to $1 billion a year by 2019.
“We simply cannot afford to do the things in this bill that we’re mandated to do,” McCollum said at a press conference after filing the suit. He said the Medicaid expansion in Florida will cost $1.6 billion.
“That’s not possible or practical to do in our state,” he said. “It’s not realistic, it’s not right, and it’s very, very wrong.”
South Carolina Attorney General Henry McMaster, who is also running for governor, said the lawsuit was necessary to protect his state’s sovereignty.
“A legal challenge by the states appears to be the only hope of protecting the American people from this unprecedented attack on our system of government,” he said.
But Lawrence Friedman, a professor who teaches constitutional law at the New England School of Law in Boston, said before the suit was filed that it has little chance of success. He said he can’t imagine a scenario where a judge would stop implementation of the health care bill.
Still, McCollum said he expects the U.S. Supreme Court will eventually decide if the overhaul is constitutional.
“This is not lawful,” he said. “It may have passed Congress, but there are three branches of government.”
Some states are looking at other ways to avoid participating. Virginia and Idaho have passed legislation aimed at blocking requirements in the bill, and the Republican-led Legislature in Florida is trying to put a constitutional amendment on the ballot to ask voters to exempt the state from the federal law’s requirements. At least 60 percent of voters would have to approve.
Under the bill, starting in six months, health insurance companies would be required to keep young adults as beneficiaries on their parents’ plans until they turn 26, and companies would no longer be allowed to deny coverage to sick children.
Other changes would not kick in until 2014.
That’s when most Americans will for the first time be required to carry health insurance — either through an employer or government program or by buying it themselves. Those who refuse will face tax penalties.
“This is the first time in American history where American citizens will be forced to buy a particular good or service,” said Nebraska Attorney General Jon Bruning, who is also president of the National Association of Attorneys General, explaining why his state joined the lawsuit.
Tax credits to help pay for premiums also will start flowing to middle-class working families with incomes up to $88,000 a year, and Medicaid will be expanded to cover more low-income people.
No Republicans in the U.S. House or Senate voted for the bill.
Associated Press Writer Meg Kinnard in Columbia, S.C., David Runk in Detroit and Josh Funk in Omaha, Neb., contributed to this report.
Tags: Access To Health Care, Barack Obama, Business And Professional Services, Constitutional Amendments, Florida, Government Programs, Government Regulations, Government-funded Health Insurance, Health care bill, Health Care Reform, Health Issues, Industry Regulation, Irs, North America, Pick'em |, Political Issues, South Carolina, Tallahassee, United States
